Law-Related Books TBR

Image
$69.95 Thirteen of the greatest lawyers in the country, such as Robert S. Bennett, Alan Dershowitz, Mark Lanier, Bryan Stevenson, and Tom Girardi share with you the powerful secrets from their most interesting cases, from depositions to trials to appeals. Lawyers can apply these techniques immediately in their practice. Non lawyers will get a front row seat to these fascinating lawyers and the turning points in their most intriguing cases. There are also 447 tips summarized in chapter checklists. Leaders of the best litigation organizations and judges have called Turning Points the best trial advocacy book. In addition, the book's website has related audio and video clips that enhance the lessons that are taught. Today's most successful lawyers benefit from the wisdom described in this book and now you can too. The book is divided into seven parts: opening statement, direct examination, cross-examination, cross-examination of the expert witness, closing argument, d

Unlawful Displacement of Local Citizens


On October 24th this was taken place. On October 31st, action was taken upon those involved. But the citizens of Cameron, MO was told nothing was to be done until November 7th. However, the tenants were told otherwise.

Cameron, MO

Despite giving only a 7-day notice the city continued to unlawfully displace local tenants. In accordance to their own city ordinances, they have not followed a single thing needed to be done. Instead they think offering the tenants a week free stay at some hotel to be considered "helping the tenants" yet when day 8 roles around, what then? What will they do then?They have each called the city landlords to help yet none are willing solely because of the place they were currently residing. THAT'S DISCRIMINATION.


And according to city ordinances if a place is truly deemed a public safety issue then placards must be placed around premises stating so, and any nearby sidewalks and streets must be shut down until the city repairs what needs to be done (for both public and private property) and then wait for the owners if privately owned to reimburse them.
So, basically, the city is stating that in order to protect the safety of the public they must first make 12 people homeless left to go out and wonder around their precious city. DURING WINTER!!


Honestly, this is by far the worst thing ever witnessed to have happened.


My question to the city: "Are you really that bored?"

And to those who actually wanted to help the Citizens Against Corruption, ask how to donate below. Anything (besides some lame advice and/or prayer) helps them at this point. We need action.

And one local sent this, stating what she has done to fight this corrupted outcome.

I sent this to the code enforcer of cameron. the code official Rea Flinn. Hello from one of the 12 tenants of 506 S. Chestnut. I wanted to inform you of the unlawful acts Timothy Wymes is placing against us. I wanted to make sure you were aware of the fact that he has threatened all of us with homelessness. And according to the city codes found here: http://www.cameron-mo.com/DocumentCenter/View/67/Property-Maintenance-Code?bidId=
This "condemnation" he is threatening us with is within violation of codes 109 and 108.1.5. Found here: 

 108.1.5 Dangerous structure or premises. For the purpose of this code, any structure or premises that have any or all of the conditions or defects described below shall be considered dangerous: Page 9 of 35 1. Any door, aisle, passageway, stairway, exit or other means of egress that does not conform to the approved building or fire code of the jurisdiction as related to the requirements for existing buildings. 2. The walking surface of any aisle, passageway, stairway, exit or other means of egress is so warped, worn loose, torn or otherwise unsafe as to not provide safe and adequate means of egress. 3. Any portion of a building, structure or appurtenance that has been damaged by fire, earthquake, wind, flood deterioration, neglect, abandonment, vandalism or by any other cause to such an extent that it is likely to partially or completely collapse, or to become detached or dislodged. 4. Any portion of a building, or any member, appurtenance or ornamentation on the exterior thereof that is not of sufficient strength or stability, or is not so anchored, attached or fastened in place so as to be capable of resisting natural or artificial loads of one and one-half the original designed value. 5. The building or structure, or part of the building or structure, because of dilapidation, deterioration, decay, faulty construction, the removal or movement of some portion of the ground necessary for the support, or for any other reason, is likely to partially or completely collapse, or some portion of the foundation or underpinning of the building or structure is likely to fail or give away. 6. The building or structure, or any portion thereof, is clearly unsafe for its use and occupancy. 7. The building or structure is neglected, damaged, dilapidated, unsecured or abandoned so as to become an attractive nuisance to children who might play in the building or structure to their danger, becomes a harbor for vagrants, criminals or immoral persons, or enables persons to resort to the building or structure for committing a nuisance or an unlawful act. 8. The building or structure has been constructed, exists or is maintained in violation of any specific requirement or prohibition applicable to such building or structure provided by the approved building or fire code of the jurisdiction, or any law or ordinance to such an extent as to present either a substantial risk of fire, building collapse or any other threat to life and safety. 108.2 Closing of vacant structures. If the structure is vacant and unfit for human habitation and occupancy, and is not in danger of structural collapse, the code official is authorized to post a placard of condemnation on the premises and order the structure closed up so as not to be an attractive nuisance. Upon failure of the owner or owner’s authorized agent to close up the premises within the time specified in the order, the code official shall cause the premises to be closed and secured through any available public agency or by contract or arrangement by private persons and the cost thereof shall be charged against the real estate upon which the structure is located and shall be a lien upon such real estate and may be collected by any other legal resource.

AND

  109.1 Imminent danger. When, in the opinion of the code official, there is imminent danger of failure or collapse of a building or structure which endangers life, or when any structure or part of a structure has fallen and life is endangered by the occupation of the structure, or when there is actual or potential danger to the building occupants or those in the proximity of any structure because of explosives, explosive fumes or vapors or the presence of toxic fumes, gases or materials, or operation of defective or dangerous equipment, the code official is hereby authorized and empowered to order and require the occupants to vacate the premises forthwith. The code official shall cause to be posted at each entrance to such structure a notice reading as follows: “This Structure Is Unsafe and Its Occupancy Has Been Prohibited by the Code Official.” It shall be unlawful for any person to enter such structure except for the purpose of securing the structure, making the required repairs, removing the hazardous condition or of demolishing the same. 109.2 Temporary safeguards. Notwithstanding other provisions of this code, whenever, in the opinion of the code official, there is imminent danger due to an unsafe condition, the code official shall order the necessary work to be done, including the boarding up of openings, to render such structure temporarily safe whether or not the legal procedure herein described has been instituted; and shall cause such other action to be taken as the code official deems necessary to meet such emergency. 109.3 Closing streets. When necessary for public safety, the code official shall temporarily close structures and closes, or orders the authority having jurisdiction to close, sidewalks, streets, public ways and places adjacent to unsafe structures, and prohibit the same from being utilized. 109.4 Emergency repairs. For the purposes of this section, the code official shall employ the necessary labor and materials to perform the required work as expeditiously as possible. 109.5 Costs of emergency repairs. Costs incurred in the performance of emergency work shall be paid by the jurisdiction. The legal counsel of the jurisdiction shall institute appropriate action against the owner of the premises or owner’s authorized agent where the unsafe structure is or was located for the recovery of such costs.   

Stating that even if the damages were as bad as he claims then the city has to repair the damages. Also, stating that unless the property is severely damaged by fire earthquake or flood then the only other way to be considered unsafe is sudden abandonment by tenants. Which he is forcing us to do basically. Considering that the owners have already ascertained the propertys structural integrity and was deemed safe. It also states that a placard has to be placed on and around the premises, along with being physically boarded up in order to consider it legally condemned. Also, it states that Cameron Utilities have to send out a disconnection notice, which was never sent to imply his threats at all. Also, its stated that if a building is indeed "unsafe for the public" as he also stated to us all, then the sidewalks and adjacent streets must be temporarily shut down until repairs are made and paid for by the city and then reimbursed by the owners to the city. 

All in all what is being done is illegal. Just because it's an "eyesore" as he stated to us, does not give reason to displace 12 tenants who otherwise have nowhere to go, no families to live with, and no money to fall back on. 

So what would you recommend?

Comments